The Bayes classifier is one of the simplest machine learning techniques. Yet despite its simplicity, it is one of the most powerful and flexible.
Being a classifier, its job is to assign a class to some input. It chooses the most likely class given the input. That is, it chooses the class that maximises .
Being a Bayes classifier, it uses Bayes’ rule to express this as the class that maximises .
All you need to build a Bayes classifier is a dataset that allows you to empirically measure and for all combinations of input and class. You can then store these values and reuse them to calculate the most likely class for an unseen input. It’s as simple as that.
This concludes the shortest Bayes classifier tutorial you’ll ever read.
Appendix: what happened to the denominator in Bayes’ rule?
Okay, so I cheated a little bit by adding an appendix. Even so, the tutorial above is a complete description of the Bayes classifier. Those familiar with Bayes’ rule would complain that when I rephrased as , the denominator is missing. This is correct; but since this denominator is independent of the value of class, it can safely be removed from the expression with the guarantee that the class that maximises it is the same as the class that would have maximised it if the denominator was still present. Look at it this way: say you want to find the value that maximises the function . This is the same value of that maximises the function , simply because the denominator, 5, is independent of the value of . We are not interested in the actual output of or , merely the value of that maximises either.
Appendix: the naïve Bayes classifier
The Bayes classifier above comes with a caveat, though: if you have even reasonably complicated input, procuring a dataset that allows you to reliably measure for all unique combinations of input and class isn’t easy! For example, if you are building a binary classifier and your input consists of four features that can take on ten values each, that’s already 20,000 combinations of features and classes! A common way to remedy this problem is to regard each feature as independent of each other. That way you only need to empirically measure the likelihood of each value of each feature occurring given a certain class. You then estimate the likelihood of an entire set of features by multiplying together the likelihood of occurrence of each of its constituent feature values. This is a naïve assumption, and so results in the creation of a naïve Bayes classifier. This is also a purposely vague summary of the workings of a naïve Bayes classifier. I would recommend an Internet search for a more in-depth treatment.